Hypotheses based on the literature review were also followed up with searches for particular semantically related terms relating to discourses found in other studies. Frequency lists, keyword lists, and word sketches were carried out in order to indicate possible directions for analysis. A corpus-based analysis was employed as a starting point to identify traces of discourses that are used to frame arguments in the gender-fair language debate. On-line newspaper texts were therefore chosen in an effort to find discourses that readers are exposed to on a regular basis, and that could be classed as widespread and familiar to the general public. Apart from the obvious fact that the media have an enormous influence on public opinion, this is where the debate on sexist language has traditionally been carried out, and thus the media play a special role in the debate. 167,000 words) spanning 15 years (2001-2016), whose main topic is (non-)sexist or gender-fair language was collected from British and French on-line national newspapers. This thesis aims at filling this gap in the field of gender and language by examining discourses on feminist linguistic reform in the media from a cross-linguistic perspective. There is also a dearth of comparative studies in gender and language, which would allow conceptions of language in general, as well as feminist linguistic reforms, to be framed in their cultural and historical perspectives. In addition, there have been very few analyses of how sexism gets debated and defined within media texts themselves, whereas examining social evaluations of language is essential in understanding the motivating force of language change. Language bodies spend a significant amount of time and money on producing guidelines, yet there have been woefully few studies on what speakers think of these reforms, and the few studies that have been carried out have tended to focus on small groups. However, the debate over gender-fair language rages on in the media. He’s a Texan, and the roster will probably reflect his connections there, but more importantly that he’s got an excellent eye for talent: which is how you win football games.The field of gender and language has gradually abandoned studies of gender-fair language, perhaps considering that there is little left to say on the subject. He even credited Lou Tepper, a former defensive coordinator at Buffalo. Obviously he worked at Buffalo for a couple years under Jeff Quinn, so that helps in a lot of unique ways. Linguist’s coaching tree is very impressive. There’s an impossible amount of work for Linguist and his not-100%-figured-out-yet coaching staff to do between now and four months from now, but I believe he’ll put in a damn good fight to get things figured out in a hurry.
But as wide as my peripherals go, this looks like Buffalo followed up firing one coach in-season with two straight home run hires. He very well could’ve stayed at Michigan and make comparable pay to be a co-defensive coordinator at another premiere school. Buffalo needed Leipold to have a chance at a guy like Linguist. Lance Leipold just signed a 6-year deal to his dream job in Kansas, and his salary more than tripled: an average of $2.75M/year.
obtained contract terms for the new coach. Maurice Linguist is in line to become the fourth-highest paid football coach in the Mid-American Conference. Lance Leipold, whom Linguist replaced as UB’s football coach, made an annual base salary of $474,300, and annual additional compensation of $150,000 in his final year at UB. The buyout would decrease to $750,000 between Dec. 15, 2021, he would owe UB $1.5 million, and that would drop to $1 million if Linguist terminates the contract between Dec. If Linguist terminates the contract before Dec. Linguist’s contract at UB, though, includes a buyout structure if Linguist is to terminate the contract before it expires.
MAURICE LINGUIST SALARY MAC
31, 2025.Īccording to a USA Today football coaching salary database published in November of 2020, Linguist’s salary would make him the fourth-highest paid coach in the MAC behind Toledo’s Jason Candle ($1.175 million), Central Michigan’s Jim McElwain ($815,000) and Western Michigan’s Tim Lester ($800,000). Linguist agreed to a 4 1/2-year contract that began Monday and will expire Dec. Under Linguist’s contract terms, obtained by The Buffalo News on Monday, the coach will earn $675,000 a year at UB with an annual base salary of $475,000 and annual additional compensation of $200,000. Maurice Linguist could become one of the top five highest paid football coaches in the Mid-American Conference. New Bulls football coach Maurice Linguist will make roughly $50k more in his first year leading the program than Lance Leipold did in his final year. Buffalo knew it couldn’t be cheap with a hire that hits all the mark and will be ready to do some insanely hard work.
0 kommentar(er)
